Diáspora critica governo de Israel

Sinais de crescente descontentamento com a política israelense emergiram, com o lançamento de uma petição de personalidades judias americanas instando por um congelamento dos assentamentos e a uma negociação sobre a soberania de Jerusalém.


A petição ‘For the Sake of Zion’ [ler abaixo na íntegra] foi inspirada pela iniciativa européia, ‘JCall (‘Chamado à Razão’), liderada pelos Amigos Franceses do PAZ AGORA (‘La Paix Maintenant’) no início deste mês.


 A campanha expôs profundas divisões nas atitudes de ingleses com relação a Israel. Paul Usiskin, presidente dos ‘Amigos Britânicos do PAZ AGORA (British Peace Now)’, disse que havia uma “angústia crescente quanto à direção do governo israelense: vozes de crítica na Europa vêm sendo desprezadas há muito tempo por Israel. Mas essas vozes irão ecoar na Diáspora”.

A petição americana, que reuniu mais de 1.100 assinaturas, diz: “Da mesma forma como nossos correligionários europeus apontam corretamente,  ‘a ocupação e a contínua busca por assentamentos na Cisjordânia e nos bairros árabes de Jerusalém … são moral e politicamente equivocados e alimentam o processo de deslegitimação que Israel está enfrentando no exterior”.

É do direito dos judeus americanos “chamar a atenção para as decisões do governo de Israel que, na nossa opinião, põe em perigo o país que tanto nos é caro”.

O comitê de organização da petição inclui pessoas como o respeitado sociólogo, professor Steven Cohen; o cientista político, professor Michael Walzer; o rabino Irwin Kula, presidente da instituição educacional Clal; e o músico Theodore Bikel.

Veio como resposta a ataques públicos à atitude do presidente Obama com Israel pelo presidente do Congresso Judaico Mundial, Ronald Lauder, entre outros.


Colin Shindler, professor de estudos israelenses na Escola de Estudos Africanos e Orientais de Londres, diz que a petição “reflete o crescente desconforto dos judeus americanos com a estagnação política e as políticas do governo Netanyahu com relação aos assentamentos”

Acrescentou que ela também reflete “as idéias da maioria dos judeus britânicos. Muitos líderes judeus aqui concordam, privadamente, que tais políticas minam seus esforços contra a deslegitimação, o desinvestimento e o boicote”.

Lucian Hudson, presidente do ‘Liberal Judaism’, diz: “Acredito que temos de adotar uma política de relacionamento crítico e construtivo com Israel, ressaltando suas conquistas mas também discutindo aspectos de sua política. Temos que atravessar este Rubicão no Reino Unido, mas precisamos chegar lá. Tem gente temendo que criticar abertamente Israel é ajudar seus inimigos”.



Por Simon Rocker, Nathan Guttman e Marcus Dysch –  publicado em Londres pelo JEWISH CHRONICLE  em 21|05|2010  e traduzido pelo PAZ AGORA|BR  



FOR THE SAKE OF ZION


http://forthesakeofzion.org/


 Encouraged by the recent European “Call For Reason,” signed by more than 5200 Jewish citizens of European countries, we, American Jews passionately devoted to the safety and welfare of the State of Israel, now add our voices to those of our European kinsfolk. They recognize, as do we, that Israel faces existential threats, both from without and from within. We do not take these lightly, but we reject the view that they are Israel’s inevitable destiny.

Some of us have lived and worked in Israel; all of us have visited there many times. We resonate strongly with Israel’s Declaration of Independence when it asserts that it is “the natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate, like all other nations, in their own sovereign state.” We believe without reservation that “Israel is the national home of the Jewish people,” and we therefore feel both entitled and obligated to make our views known.

Together with all Israeli citizens, both Jews and Arabs, we lament the decades of death and destruction that have plagued the Land of Israel. We categorically condemn terrorism and we mourn the tragic loss of blood and treasure that has afflicted the region over the years. At the same time, we abhor the continuing occupation that has persisted for far too long; it cannot and should not be sustained. As our European counterparts correctly point out, “[T]he occupation and the continuing pursuit of settlements in the West Bank and in the Arab districts of Jerusalem . . . are morally and politically wrong and feed the unacceptable de-legitimation process that Israel currently faces abroad.” They go on to say, “Israel will soon be faced with two equally disastrous choices: either to become a state in which Jews are a minority in their own country, or to establish a regime that would be a disgrace to Israel and lead to civil unrest.” We agree.


Recent and ongoing developments in Jerusalem, Ramallah and Washington give rise to a still extremely fragile hope that finally, both Israelis and Palestinians may be ready to revive the peace process and to engage in negotiations. Ultimately, the long-term security and welfare of the democratic Jewish State of Israel depend upon a genuine resolution of the conflict within the framework of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in comity.

Advancing toward a two-state solution will require significant concessions and commitments by both sides. Among these: Terrorism must stop, and the Palestinians will need to set aside their claimed “right of return” to Israel, which would undermine the very notion of a Jewish state; they must vigorously oppose incitement against Israel. Israel, for its part, will need to dismantle the settlements considered illegal under Israeli law; protect Palestinians from maltreatment and violence by extreme elements of the settler community; set aside its insistence on exclusive sovereignty over all of expanded Jerusalem, including Arab neighborhoods, where, we anticipate, the designated capital of the new state of Palestine will be located.


As Americans and as Jews who care deeply for the security and welfare of the State of Israel, we endorse the American government’s vigorous encouragement of the parties to make the concessions necessary for negotiations to advance. In that context, we call upon Israel immediately to cease construction of housing in the disputed territories.


It is the citizens of Israel and their neighbors who will decide on their future; that is their undoubted right. Ours is to call attention to decisions the government of Israel takes which, in our view, endanger the State we hold so dear.


 We invite all those of similar view to sign this statement. 



ORGANIZING COMMITTEE
Affiliations for identification purposes only.


Rabbi Ellen Weinberg Dreyfus, President, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Chicago, IL
Peter Edelman, Professor of Law, Georgetown Law Center, Washington, DC
Dr. Leonard Fein, Author, Boston, MA
Rabbi Ed Feinstein, Encino, CA
Rabbi Laura Geller, Los Angeles, CA
Prof. Paula Hyman, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Rabbi Irwin Kula, President, Clal: The National Jewish Center for Learning & Leadership, New York, NY
Rabbi Esther Lederman, Temple Micah, Washington, DC
Rabbi Brian Lurie, Former CEO, United Jewish Appeal, San Francisco, CA
Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon, Congregation B’nai Jeshurun, New York, NY
Judge Abner Mikva, Former Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, DC, & White House Counsel, Washington, DC
Prof. Deborah Dash Moore, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Samuel Norich, Publisher, The Forward, New York, NY
Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Writer, New York, NY
M.J. Rosenberg, Media Matters For America, Washington, DC
Rabbi David Saperstein, Religious Action Center, Washington, DC
Daniel Sieradski, Former publisher, Jewschool.com, Brooklyn, NY
Daniel Sokatch, CEO, New Israel Fund, San Francisco, CA
Jeffrey R. Solomon, President, The Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies, New York, NY
Rabbi Toba Spitzer, Past President, Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, West Newton, MA
Prof. Michael Walzer, Emeritus Professor, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, NJ
Steven J. Zipperstein, Daniel E. Koshland Professor in Jewish History & Culture, Stanford U., Menlo Park  …. 

Comentários estão fechados.